mirror of
https://github.com/Combodo/iTop.git
synced 2026-02-27 06:04:12 +01:00
module dependency optimization - refacto + dependency new sort order
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,45 +2,18 @@
|
||||
|
||||
namespace Combodo\iTop\Test\UnitTest\Setup;
|
||||
|
||||
use Combodo\iTop\Test\UnitTest\ItopTestCase;
|
||||
use Combodo\iTop\Test\UnitTest\ItopDataTestCase;
|
||||
use ModuleDiscovery;
|
||||
|
||||
class ModuleDiscoveryTest extends ItopTestCase
|
||||
class ModuleDiscoveryTest extends ItopDataTestCase
|
||||
{
|
||||
public function setUp(): void {
|
||||
parent::setUp();
|
||||
$this->RequireOnceItopFile('setup/modulediscovery.class.inc.php');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testSortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending()
|
||||
{
|
||||
$aOngoingDependencies=[];
|
||||
$aExpectedKeys=[];
|
||||
for($i=5; $i>0; $i--){
|
||||
$sKey = "k$i";
|
||||
$aExpectedKeys[]=$sKey;
|
||||
$aDeps=[];
|
||||
for ($j=0; $j<$i; $j++){
|
||||
$aDeps[]=$j;
|
||||
}
|
||||
$aOngoingDependencies[$sKey]=$aDeps;
|
||||
}
|
||||
sort($aExpectedKeys);
|
||||
|
||||
\ModuleDiscovery::SortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending($aOngoingDependencies);
|
||||
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($aExpectedKeys, array_keys($aOngoingDependencies));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testOrderModulesByDependencies_CheckMissingDependenciesAreCorrectlyOrderedInTheException()
|
||||
{
|
||||
$sExpectedMessage = <<<MSG
|
||||
The following modules have unmet dependencies:
|
||||
label2 (id: id2/456) depends on: ❌ id3/666,
|
||||
label1 (id: id1/123) depends on: ❌ id3/666 + ❌ id4/666
|
||||
MSG;
|
||||
|
||||
$this->expectExceptionMessage($sExpectedMessage);
|
||||
|
||||
$aModules=[
|
||||
"id1/123" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id3/666', 'id4/666'],
|
||||
@@ -51,34 +24,115 @@ MSG;
|
||||
'label' => 'label2',
|
||||
],
|
||||
];
|
||||
\ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true);
|
||||
$iLoopCount=0;
|
||||
try{
|
||||
ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true, null, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
} catch(\MissingDependencyException $e){
|
||||
$sExpectedMessage = <<<MSG
|
||||
The following modules have unmet dependencies:
|
||||
label2 (id: id2/456) depends on: ❌ id3/666,
|
||||
label1 (id: id1/123) depends on: ❌ id3/666 + ❌ id4/666
|
||||
MSG;
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($sExpectedMessage, $e->getMessage());
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(1, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testOrderModulesByDependencies_ValidateExceptionWithSomeDependenciesResolved()
|
||||
{
|
||||
$sExpectedMessage = <<<MSG
|
||||
The following modules have unmet dependencies:
|
||||
label1 (id: id1/123) depends on: ✅ id2/456 + ❌ id4/666
|
||||
MSG;
|
||||
|
||||
$this->expectExceptionMessage($sExpectedMessage);
|
||||
|
||||
$aModules=[
|
||||
"id1/123" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id2/456', 'id4/666'],
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id2/456', 'id4/666', 'id3/789'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label1',
|
||||
],
|
||||
"id2/456" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [],
|
||||
'label' => 'label2',
|
||||
],
|
||||
"id3/789" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id2/456', 'id4/666'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label3',
|
||||
],
|
||||
];
|
||||
\ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true);
|
||||
$iLoopCount=0;
|
||||
try{
|
||||
ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true, null, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
} catch(\MissingDependencyException $e){
|
||||
$sExpectedMessage = <<<MSG
|
||||
The following modules have unmet dependencies:
|
||||
label3 (id: id3/789) depends on: ✅ id2/456 + ❌ id4/666,
|
||||
label1 (id: id1/123) depends on: ✅ id2/456 + ❌ id4/666 + ❌ id3/789
|
||||
MSG;
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($sExpectedMessage, $e->getMessage());
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(2, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testOrderModulesByDependencies_KeepGoingEvenWithFailure_WithSomeDependenciesResolved()
|
||||
{
|
||||
$aModules=[
|
||||
"id1/123" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id2/456', 'id4/666', 'id3/789'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label1',
|
||||
],
|
||||
"id2/456" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [],
|
||||
'label' => 'label2',
|
||||
],
|
||||
"id3/789" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id2/456', 'id4/666'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label3',
|
||||
],
|
||||
];
|
||||
$iLoopCount=0;
|
||||
$aResult = ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, false, null, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
|
||||
$aExpected = [
|
||||
'id2/456'
|
||||
];
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($aExpected, array_keys($aResult));
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(2, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testOrderModulesByDependencies_UnResolveWithCircularDependency()
|
||||
{
|
||||
$aModules=[
|
||||
"id1/1" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id2/2'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label1',
|
||||
],
|
||||
"id2/2" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => ['id3/3'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label2',
|
||||
],
|
||||
"id3/3" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => ['id4/4'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label3',
|
||||
],
|
||||
"id4/4" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => ['id1/1'],
|
||||
'label' => 'label4',
|
||||
],
|
||||
];
|
||||
$iLoopCount=0;
|
||||
|
||||
try{
|
||||
ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true, null, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
} catch(\MissingDependencyException $e){
|
||||
$sExpectedMessage = <<<MSG
|
||||
The following modules have unmet dependencies:
|
||||
label1 (id: id1/1) depends on: ❌ id2/2,
|
||||
label4 (id: id4/4) depends on: ❌ id1/1,
|
||||
label3 (id: id3/3) depends on: ❌ id4/4,
|
||||
label2 (id: id2/2) depends on: ❌ id3/3
|
||||
MSG;
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($sExpectedMessage, $e->getMessage());
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(1, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testOrderModulesByDependencies_ResolveOk()
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
$aModules=[
|
||||
"id1/1" => [
|
||||
'dependencies' => [ 'id2/2'],
|
||||
@@ -97,7 +151,8 @@ MSG;
|
||||
'label' => 'label4',
|
||||
],
|
||||
];
|
||||
$aResult = \ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true);
|
||||
$iLoopCount=0;
|
||||
$aResult = ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true, null, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
|
||||
$aExpected = [
|
||||
"id4/4",
|
||||
@@ -106,5 +161,79 @@ MSG;
|
||||
"id1/1",
|
||||
];
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($aExpected, array_keys($aResult));
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(1, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testOrderModulesByDependencies_RealExample(){
|
||||
$aModules = json_decode(file_get_contents(__DIR__ . '/ressources/module_deps.json'), true);
|
||||
$iLoopCount=0;
|
||||
$aResult = ModuleDiscovery::OrderModulesByDependencies($aModules, true, null, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
|
||||
$aExpected = json_decode(file_get_contents(__DIR__ . '/ressources/expected_ordered_module_ids.json'), true);
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($aExpected, array_keys($aResult));
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(1, $iLoopCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testSortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending_NoDependencies(){
|
||||
$aUnresolvedDependencyModules = [];
|
||||
foreach (['a', 'b', 'c'] as $sModuleId){
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, $sModuleId, []);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ModuleDiscovery::SortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending($aUnresolvedDependencyModules);
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(['a', 'b', 'c'], array_keys($aUnresolvedDependencyModules));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testSortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending_NominalUseCase(){
|
||||
$aUnresolvedDependencyModules = [];
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, 'itop-change-mgmt/456', ['itop-config-mgmt/2.2.0', 'itop-tickets/2.0.0']);
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, 'itop-tickets/2.0.0', ['itop-structure/2.7.1']);
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, 'itop-config-mgmt/123', ['itop-structure/2.7.1']);
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, 'itop-structure/2.7.1', []);
|
||||
|
||||
ModuleDiscovery::SortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending($aUnresolvedDependencyModules);
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(
|
||||
[
|
||||
'itop-structure/2.7.1',
|
||||
'itop-tickets/2.0.0',
|
||||
'itop-config-mgmt/123',
|
||||
'itop-change-mgmt/456',
|
||||
], array_keys($aUnresolvedDependencyModules));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testSortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending_NominalUseCaseWithMissingDependency(){
|
||||
$aUnresolvedDependencyModules = [];
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, 'itop-change-mgmt/456', ['itop-config-mgmt/2.2.0', 'itop-tickets/2.0.0']);
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, 'itop-tickets/2.0.0', ['itop-structure/2.7.1']);
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, 'itop-config-mgmt/123', ['itop-structure/2.7.1']);
|
||||
|
||||
ModuleDiscovery::SortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending($aUnresolvedDependencyModules);
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(
|
||||
[
|
||||
'itop-tickets/2.0.0',
|
||||
'itop-config-mgmt/123',
|
||||
'itop-change-mgmt/456',
|
||||
],
|
||||
array_keys($aUnresolvedDependencyModules));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private function AddModule(array &$aUnresolvedDependencyModules, string $sModuleId, array $aDeps){
|
||||
$oModule = new \Module($sModuleId);
|
||||
$oModule->SetDependencies($aDeps);
|
||||
$aUnresolvedDependencyModules[$sModuleId]= $oModule;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function testSortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending_RealExample(){
|
||||
$aUnresolvedDependencyModules = [];
|
||||
$aDependencies = json_decode(file_get_contents(__DIR__ . '/ressources/module_deps.json'), true);
|
||||
foreach ($aDependencies as $sModuleId => $aModuleData){
|
||||
$this->AddModule($aUnresolvedDependencyModules, $sModuleId, $aModuleData['dependencies']);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ModuleDiscovery::SortModulesByCountOfDepencenciesDescending($aUnresolvedDependencyModules);
|
||||
|
||||
$aExpected = json_decode(file_get_contents(__DIR__ . '/ressources/expected_ordered_module_ids.json'), true);
|
||||
$this->assertEquals(
|
||||
$aExpected,
|
||||
array_keys($aUnresolvedDependencyModules));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user